The calculations of the Accountant Olbia Sole24ore analysts leave no doubt: The local taxes are eating those minimum relief that the operation for 2007 recognizes the lowest incomes. The numbers are especially unforgiving for singles, but not all. Here are some of the most indicative. In Bologna, the city personal income tax goes from 0.4% to 0.7% with an increase in terms of percentage of 75%. A single person under 20 000 € Felsineo income sees it transformed the national levy discount of 75 € an increase of 65 € by the city council to levy increased by € 140.
The situation is obviously worse as we move to older ages. With the increase of € 200 on revenue of the municipal 25 mila lo sconto di 59 euro diventa un + 141. I single con redditi da 35 mila e 40 mila euro passano rispettivamente da un - 83 e un + 28 previsti dalla manovra nazionale a +157 e +348. Anche grazie all'aumento dell'addizionale regionale - dallo 0,2 allo 0,5 - Bologna è il caso più eclatante ma le cose non vanno molto meglio in altre grandi città tutte peraltro governate dalla stessa maggioranza di governo. A Roma e Torino l'incremento dell'addizionale comunale è stato ancora più pesante in termini di percentuali, passando dallo 0,2 allo 0,5 (+150%). L'aumento compensa di gran lunga lo sconto sull'Ici sul quale la giunta guidata da Walter Veltroni ha posto grande enfasi. L'imposta sugli immobili nella capitale, peraltro, si riduce sì dal 4,9 al 4,6% (circa 40 euro) sulla prima casa ma aumenta sulla seconda casa (dal 6,9 al 7%) e sulle aeree fabbricabili (dal 6,9 al 9%). Ma non è tutto.
Dallo studio del Sole le agevolazioni nazionali risultano svanire anche sui prospetti riguardanti i redditi familiari, nonostante gli assegni previsti dal ministro Bindi per questa categoria di contribuenti. Consideriamo in questo caso soltanto la fascia più bassa entro i 20 mila euro, quella cioè dove gli sconti di Visco dovrebbero incidere di più. Una famiglia tipo con un lavoratore dipendente con moglie e due figli a carico vede la propria detrazione Irpef da 191 euro ridursi a 77 a Bologna, a 108 a Roma, a 67 a Torino.
Insomma pian Plan the crumbs redistributive planned by Vincenzo Visco disappearing when not having the character of real sting for all income. The seriousness of the situation has become that trigger a dispute between Guglielmo Epifani and his predecessor Cofferati, now increasingly at loggerheads. The leader of the CGIL did not mince words: it may take more with the local hand than to be given by the national hand. Cofferati, for its part, has returned to the sender's accusation companion: "The budget that the unions had a positive verdict, leading to additional, to the ticket, the high mark." Who is right? In fact it was not hard to predict what is going on. In the aftermath of Presentation of Financial Anci and Regions strongly manifested their opposition to the heavy cuts in transfers to local authorities. The outcome of the clash led to the release of additional local without instructions from the previous government in 2002. How surprised now? Has anyone received the new rates of the government as a gift for the most needy and instead? Timeo Danaos et ferentes gives.
redistributive policies are in fact always counterproductive for the economy: high taxes on high incomes discouraged the initiative of the most productive part of the country. In our case, however, it adds insult to injury. Even these minimal benefits on behalf of whom the government had wasted in alchemy tax have finished it to find little application. All this also shows how difficult it is to plan a serious policy of cuts and how the advent of a true fiscal federalism can no longer disregard a responsibility of local authorities to meet their own budgets. A modern and efficient tax system should aim at increasing simplification of its operation: a reduction in the number of rates at this point. It appears instead as an articulation of clearly excessive taxation mechanisms end up: 1) make it less predictable the final effects are the institutions themselves, 2) encourage taxpayers to pay tax consultants, 3) reduce the transparency of policy Economic implemented by various central and peripheral levels of government. To paraphrase an editorial that has caused a sensation we wonder: who is more liberal? About complicates and raises taxes or any person who facilitates and monitors?
Carlo D'Andrea
Accountant Accountant Olbia Olbia 
0 comments:
Post a Comment